Rechtsextreme werden erfunden, um Meinungsfreiheit einzuschränken

Hier ist ein interessanter Fall einer „false flag“-Aktion:

Ezra Levant dokumentiert,

how in the 1960s the Canadian Jewish Congress spent its donors‘ money building up the „Canadian Nazi Party“ as a straw man for them to later bravely knock down, with cameras rolling. It all made no sense if the CJC’s goal was to make the country safer for Jews; it made a lot of sense if the CJC’s goal was to usher in powerful new censorship laws for its own use, and to write dramatic fundraising letters — in other words, to perpetuate the symbiosis between themselves as „victims“ and fake Nazis as „victimizers“.
http://ezralevant.com/2008/07/the-moral-hazard-of-being-in-t.html

Because that’s the moral hazard of the being in the anti-hate business. If there’s not enough hate, you have to change your line of work. Or: as the CJC did in 1966, and as they’re doing today through the human rights commissions, they drum up a fake danger, manufacture a menace, help them out even, and then expose the whole thing and posit themselves as the remedy.